Page Loading... please wait!


This message not going away?
Ensure Javascript is on and click the box
Jul 31, 2010 - 04:21 PM  
CDC Chatter  
 
 

Articles recently moved to topics

Search


Online users

There are 15 unlogged users and 0 registered users online.

You can log-in or register for a user account here.

Topic: Facilities Boondoggles !

Posted by: Anonymous on Sunday, January 15, 2006 - 03:00 PM Print article Printer-friendly page  Email to a friend Send this story to someone
Business Systems -  Facilities - Funding
We have just learned that another outstanding Facilities Employee is leaving.

No doubt due to the fiasco created by the past couple of CDC Senior Management teams, need for power, desire to leave a legacy of opulent rather than functional buildings, and need to be seen in the spotlight by trying to control the Billion Dollar Facilities Master Plan Funding. Instead of trusting the talented Facilities Managers, Architects, Engineers and Tradesmen already on staff, they reorganized to by-pass managers and staff of the Existing ESO office, followed by DCMO, FPMO and FEO offices, creating the Facilities Planning and Management office, and wasting an SES position. None of the FPMO directors have had any legitimate BSL-3/4 or Chemical Laboratory experience.

Since the first such director buzzed in, in 2000, there has been nothing but turmoil in the Facilities Offices. Employees who sought to provide the most functional buildings at the best cost to the government have been muzzled, threatened and bypassed. When Facilities Managers refused to issue contracts, they were by-passed by going directly to lower level employees. These employees were promised promotions and training for working around their bosses.

Money has been squandered on $500+ European Guest chairs when American made chairs on GSA schedule or from UNICOR could have been purchased for under $150/each. The expensive chairs are already falling apart.

Contracts for Furniture design and purchase have been given to General Contractors, to circumvent federal purchasing requirements, increasing costs over 30%.

Building costs have over run budgets because of the CDC OD's desire for a monument and visitor center/museum. Why do we have 20 different carpets when 5 or less would have been the norm?

Of, course we have a CDC director who had Facilities Employees repaint her bathroom in building 16, numerous times in order to get the right shade of pink. The same person is so concerned with wasting government employees time and money repainting a bathroom only she and the cleaning person will see.

It is so sad that the outstanding staff assembled in the late 80's and early 90's is rapidly fleeing the incompetence and outright arrogance of the string of FPMO directors since 2000. Of course the biggest Fiasco is reorganizing the Facilities Wage Grade Staff "to save their jobs," when it is clear that they are being set up for failure and contracting out. Speaking of Contracting out isn't it the most amazing thing that all the maintenance contracts seem to be going to Four Seasons. We see the almost invisible line of separation between Four Seasons Management and FEO managers. What about all the "Hogs" and road trips these days.

Let us not forget, that no one remembered to budget for the cleaning and maintenance of the new buildings. When were the bathrooms last cleaned in the new buildings?

Where did all the money for those $12,000/per person office/workstations in the new building come from? Was the opulent furniture funded by the R&I budget. Thought that was for Repair and Improvement of the existing buildings and facilities.

How many more employees will leave? Sadly Facilities have already lost: George, Maureen, Linda, Pam, Georgia, Craig, Sam, Wayne, Eugene, plus far too many more of the fine Architects, Engineers and Tradesmen to retirements, the private sector, other CDC offices and other Federal Agencies.

Thanks for creating this blog. The above is a composite of information from numerous anonymous sources in the Facilities, Procurement and EEO offices. No doubt the search for these Anonymous sources (AKA Whistleblowers) will involve the creation of a special prosecutor, since this is the CDC way.

Facilities Boondoggles ! | Log-in or register a new user account | 13 Comments
  
Comments are statements made by the person who posted them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site editor.

Re: Facilities Boondoggles !

(Score: 1, Informative)
by Anonymous on Jan 16, 2006 - 07:43 AM
You neglected to mention another "tidbit". How can anyone justify 40+ never used, stainless steel cages, located at the Lawrenceville Facility, to being "scrapped"? They've set there so long that they have sunk into the asphalt, and now it requires a forklift to remove them from their trap. And why is it that CDC supplies the forklift to the contractor that bid on the removal of them? And how much is it going to cost to repair the damaged asphalt, from where the cages sunk into it? I can't help but wonder if CDC isn't going to buy the cages back once they are cleaned up. Oh that's right, it'll be cheaper than buying new ones. Clear as Mud....

Re: Facilities Boondoggles !

(Score: 1, Informative)
by Anonymous on Jan 16, 2006 - 12:44 PM
The worse part is nothing, I mean NOTHING was even bid on the interiors. The CDC interior designer in DCMO was off and about with one of the the manufacturer which certainly would appear to be a conflict of interest, but then who am I to judge.
Certainly, the new castle on Clifton is a new goal for future buildings to try to top. Upwards and onwards.

Re: Facilities Boondoggles !

(Score: 1, Interesting)
by Anonymous on Jan 17, 2006 - 03:19 PM
Why were the experts in DCMO and FEO expert opinions ignored by the FPPMO program managers? Why weren't established agency standards followed? Why was oppulence allowed over Stainless Steel Ductwork. We are a government Laboratory Agency, not a Las Vagas Hotel.

Why are outside Architects and Engineers being allowed to bypass CDC's design standards and specify furniture that doesn't meet Design Standards which were throughly vetted to purchase the furniture that was functional and the best value to the government. Why were carpets, furniture, etc.. specified that is not available on GSA schedule.

It is outrageous that cuts were made on the new buildings to pay for the opulence from the building operation systems. Look at all the problems with the new HVAC control systems in the new Laboratories.

Have we sacraficed our employees Safety working in the Laboratories so our Director can build a show case or Architectural firms can win design awards. The IG or someone needs to look at the cost and waste on these buildings

Re: Facilities Boondoggles !

(Score: 1, Informative)
by Anonymous on Jan 21, 2006 - 08:36 AM
It is obvious that no one look at what we do and how we work. It is bad enough that we have to live in , but these are horrible, the worse. The noise level is sometimes unblievable and it is like being on display in a glass fishbowl. There is not enough storage and the storage there is does not work. With all the money that was spent, someone should have talked to us to see what we needed.

Re: Facilities Boondoggles !

(Score: 2, Interesting)
by Anonymous on Jan 24, 2006 - 01:09 PM
Editor: I have no wish to be anonymous, I am happy to put my name to this response, but seem to have missed a step. If possible, you may attribute this to me, and I have signed at the bottom of my comment.

I must correct the one misstatement about which I have first-hand knowledge. I was Dr.Gerberding's Executive Assistant at the time the painting of her bathroom was requested and that request came from me. The Director did not request that the painting be done nor did she select the colors. At the time, we were trying to retrofit the Director's office to make it more comfortable and workable for our first woman diirector and since she used the bathroom in the suite to do her hair and make-up for the many media interviews which were required of her, I consulted with our in-house architectural team to see if we could have more storage installed and if we could creat a better lighting system. As we were making those changes, I asked if we could paint the room a standard beige rather than the shop-worn white that was on the walls. While I was picking a color from the swatches provided, I mentioned that i would like to paint the foot and a half strip above the molding at the top of the wall red, which is a favorite color of our Director's. Everyone seemed to think it was a great idea at the time. Since the crew sent to paint were not professional painters, and since I hadn't consulted HGTV and didn't know any better, I did not suggest that they first prime the white wall with a tinted primer, which would have meant that only a primer and one coat would have been required instead of the several that eventually was needed to get a smooth appearance. This occured a long time ago and I had forgotten the incident until it appeared in the blog, but I can assure you that our Director asked for few special privileges and it was my desire for her comfort that precipitated the painting of the bathroom and the red strip.

Patricia Skousen
Office of the Chief of Staff

  • Re: Facilities Boondoggles ! by Anonymous on Mar 08, 2006 - 06:08 AM
  • Re: Facilities Boondoggles !

    (Score: 1, Informative)
    by Anonymous on Feb 19, 2006 - 08:05 AM
    Don't know about all the buildings, but what do you expect when you put an interior decorator in charge. Keep this in mind the next time you complain that you don't have enough money to do this or that.

    http://www.cdcchatter.net